Tuesday, February 14, 2006

Can You Walk In Wrestling Shoes

CABARET!


Perhaps it is wrong to use the blog as an advertising platform but ... You can not miss the program Greyhound Warm and Brian Duke! It is called "Nursery Cabaret" and just released the first installment. If you are a regular of "Tin soldier is the rule," you can get an idea of \u200b\u200bthe program line.
Every two weeks, hang a new childcare program, so stay tuned. You can (and should) listen on the website of Cabaret Nursery.

Saturday, February 11, 2006

Does Quinine Dissolve In Ch2cl2

cartoons AND FANS


I have taken in doing so, but I had to talk about the controversy that generated the Muhammad cartoons. Controversy has become a violent protest by thousands of brainless and has revived the debate on freedom of expression. Each time I have more clear that World War III (what a bad roll da write these words) will find their trigger in some bullshit, maybe not blown for a penalty in the final of a World Cup, for instance.
"Freedom of speech" I have seen / heard / read as more than one commentator stale media are filled his mouth to utter the formula. "We fought for freedom of expression and can not undo the advanced way", but of course, freedom of expression with respect and that does not attack religious beliefs.
affirm that there is still censorship and freedom of expression is just that, a phrase that is pronounced with a big mouth and mind shrunk. There is still censorship, perhaps not the snip, but rather an indictment in other forms. "Wow - think someone .- You talk about censorship and nobody prevents you express what you leaves the balls in a blog. Fine, but what if I apply for a scholarship for an art project? What if I get a literary prize to earn a living doing what I Like? No doubt I'll have to censor themselves. And self-censorship is the worst form of censorship, because the blame is yourself. The scissors are invisible.
But where I go is the theme of "star" that is placed on "freedom of expression," the fine print. In this "freedom of speech yes, but not touching religion." Is it that those who believe that religion (in capitals) is one of the great problems of humanity have no right to express it? Why this mania to protect religion from criticism? Did not think freely about sex, politics, terrorism ...? But not about religion. Because Faith is like a house of cards: if someone slams the door the little castle is going to hell. The foundations of faith are so fragile that they must be protected fanatically. Talking about religion in these terms is not within the concept of "free speech" that defend the four assholes who are always swells the chest when they call themselves "democrats." And yes, I can say in this blog. But it's a fucking blog! I can also crap in God and the King, out loud in the privacy of my home. But that is not freedom of expression.

Sunday, February 5, 2006

Blueprints On A Dunk Tank




I learn on the web Rights Digital Freedom the following story: "He created the Foundation for the Defense of the English Nation. "One of them said that is not a purely intellectual movement. It is a popular movement to defend the English nation is at stake . What a crap. It's that old to see them two days left to die in terror because it is "at risk" the English nation and it seems pathetic. "These children costume kicking like idiots have nothing else to mount a futile foundation bitch?
What you see on the poster is the logo background Foundation: a tree whose trunk is painted with the colors of the English flag which flows into smaller branches that show the colors of the flags autonomous communities. Go metaphor bottle.
What the hell are going to do in the foundation? "Getting together to watch the Spain-Malta VHS? Doing readings from Captain Thunder comics? At the moment the first action to be undertaken has been draft a criminal complaint against the words of actor Pepe Rubianes broadcast on TV3 on the ground that incite hatred toward Spain and the English . Pepe Rubianes want to load to Spain! Help!
One of the kingpins of the foundation is Amando de Miguel, who says nationalists are trying to eradicate the Castilian, a common language not only the English but 400 million people worldwide . How can a sociologist think that a minority threatens a language spoken by 400 million people fucking? Are there good reasons to be afraid? Or is that they are bored and want to give a little excitement to their lives?
Well, if you take a look at all this shit in the news please visit Digital Freedom or the official website of the foundation .