Wrinkle Cream Fillers

The 11-M, the street

The 11-M, the street

The Supreme Court has said for the umpteenth time that the interception system, Sitel is legal and even much more guarantees that the previous system.

However, the PP remains for the House on Tuesday a motion that says that since it launched in 2005 by the Zapatero government is taking a systematic violation of fundamental rights.

Suppose, arguendo, that the missing Tuesday deputies there are errors in the voting or any other circumstance occurs that moves forward the motion law of the PP.

Then, the House of Congress Sitel is certified that violates fundamental rights. And though the annulment of constitutional rules not for the Congress, the House desautorizaría the Supreme and would open the door for them to request the annulment of thousands of lawsuits in which it has been listening, even if authorized by the judge, from 2005. All at the request of a party that aspires to govern again.

A syllogism that serves as an example:

- Esteban González Pons (PP) has admitted today that the Aznar government Sitel used in the investigation of 11-M.
- The PP says that this system violates fundamental rights and is unconstitutional.
- The conclusion is that the lawyers of those convicted of the 11-M may request the annulment of the convictions for violation of fundamental rights. Before the Constitutional Court in Strasbourg. May argue that if the party says ruling and directed the police something there. And if the PP is right all of the 11-M must go out.

Or not