Charged by the network of money living in mansions
And charging for social aid
Beggars and Romanians were used as proxies to hide billions properties
research unravel the tax allowed a complex web of shell companies in the Ria de Arousa
research unravel the tax allowed a complex web of shell companies in the Ria de Arousa
Research Tax Agency in Galicia allowed to charge fifty residents of the Ria de Arousa in three frames of money laundering used a different approach than usual to bring out hidden properties on behalf of third parties. The agents were not limited to inspect the business of suspects, or was it because of small shops with little movement or even the business existed. So we opted for the investigation, which began cross-referencing data between the real economic situation of individuals investigated and officially declaring. The investigation focused on those cases where there was a palpable difference between data and others. Then calculated the actual value of the properties, which were generally priced lower, and investigated the family, friends and relatives of suspects. All this helped bring to light some very interesting data that served to open proceedings in the courts and charge fifty people for money laundering from drug trafficking, and seize assets worth 650 million euros.
Assuming that the alleged ringleaders of the network only had property or businesses in their names, we investigated the ownership of property suspected of being his own, though they appear on behalf of third parties. And among them were even beggars, or people who really had no assets or income to enable them to survive and whose name, however, contained in companies of which they knew nothing in practice.
also used to foreigners. Most were of Romanian origin, and presumably, though those suspicions are still research in the courts, which received some kind of perks in return for lending their identity.
That was one of the major successes of the investigation, which unlike other times, allowed to float the identity and assets of the nominees. "It is difficult but not impossible, to highlight research sources. For if the goods are placed on behalf of third parties but these third parties do not have a job or assets to justify it, you have to do is to investigate these third parties. "
Priority for school choice
And their families to date resources were modest or even poor, without any remorse benefited from the aid that society makes available to the needy. And so, some of those investigated for laundering drug money received subsidies, and their children perceived scholarships. And in some cases even had preferred to choose the school of children relying on their small incomes. "That was another evidence that led to the investigations, if your children receive scholarships, but you live in a villa with swimming pool, it is clear that something is not home."
One of the leaders even bought an SUV for his wife when she gave birth. Perhaps while receiving all kinds of aid for the breeding of offspring.
0 comments:
Post a Comment