Yes: Still lifes give me fucking sick. Does anyone see him grace to put together a couple of fruit and a bottle for portraits?
After a brief incursion into the Google Images search, I discover that continue to paint still life in the wild. There is a painter who shows in his repertoire. And perhaps as a way of learning is not bad, but as an artistic object is garbage. I would say that the guy who paints a still life is because it is dry of ideas.
not now I think of anything more mediocre than a still life. Perhaps a Marine. The Marine also stinks. And I write all this because I think the issue of the still life serves as a metaphor for understanding what is happening right now in the world of art. In the film, in literature. Too many people are content to "paint still life, doing something mediocre and above resultón and throw balls to call it art. Because, why would we want to portray reality if your best picture is the reality? Is it supposed to convey something I have to paint the broken jar, this orange and a bottle of tintorro? Something that I did not convey the same objects in reality? Art serves to re-contextualize, to give us something of what the "reality" is lacking.
So: no more still lifes, please.
0 comments:
Post a Comment